Validity of point-mass model in off-resonance dynamic atomic force microscopy

dc.contributor.authorRAJPUT, SHATRUHAN SINGHen_US
dc.contributor.authorDEOPA, SURYA PRATAP S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAJITH, V. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKAMERKAR, SUKRUT C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPATIL, SHIVPRASADen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Physicsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-23T11:33:16Z
dc.date.available2021-07-23T11:33:16Z
dc.date.issued2021-10en_US
dc.description.abstractThe quantitative measurement of viscoelasticity of nano-scale entities is an important goal of nanotechnology research and there is considerable progress with advent of dynamic atomic force microscopy. The hydrodynamics of cantilever, the force sensor in AFM measurements, plays a pivotal role in quantitative estimates of nano-scale viscoelasticity. The point-mass (PM) model, wherein the AFM cantilever is approximated as a point-mass with mass-less spring is widely used in dynamic AFM analysis and its validity, particularly in liquid environments, is debated. It is suggested that the cantilever must be treated as a continuous rectangular beam to obtain accurate estimates of nano-scale viscoelasticity of materials it is probing. Here, we derived equations, which relate stiffness and damping coefficient of the material under investigation to measured parameters, by approximating cantilever as a point-mass and also considering the full geometric details. These equations are derived for both tip-excited as well as base-excited cantilevers. We have performed off-resonance dynamic atomic force spectroscopy on a single protein molecule to investigate the validity of widely used PM model. We performed measurements with AFMs equipped with different cantilever excitation methods as well as detection schemes to measure cantilever response. The data was analyzed using both, continuous beam model and the PM model. We found that both models yield same results when the experiments are performed in truly off-resonance regime with small amplitudes and the cantilever stiffness is much higher than the interaction stiffness. Our findings suggest that a simple PM approximation based model is adequate to describe the dynamics, provided care is taken while performing experiments so that the approximations used in these models are valid.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNanotechnology, 32(40), 405702.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0957-4484en_US
dc.identifier.issn1361-6528en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleNanotechnologyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/6099
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac0cb1
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_US
dc.subjectViscoelasticityen_US
dc.subjectSingle-molecule force spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectAtomic force microscope (AFM)en_US
dc.subjectAmplitude-modulation AFMen_US
dc.subject2021-JUL-WEEK3en_US
dc.subjectTOC-JUL-2021en_US
dc.subject2021en_US
dc.titleValidity of point-mass model in off-resonance dynamic atomic force microscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections