Meta-Analysis of Prevalence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Its Clinical Features at Incidence in Indian Patients With Breast Cancer

dc.contributor.authorKULKARNI, APURVen_US
dc.contributor.authorKelkar, Devaki A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPARIKH, NIDHIen_US
dc.contributor.authorSHASHIDHARA, L.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKoppiker, Chaitanyanand B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, Madhuraen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Biologyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-12T06:37:17Z
dc.date.available2021-04-12T06:37:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-08en_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women in India, with higher incidence rates of aggressive subtypes, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: A systematic review was performed to compute pooled prevalence rates of TNBC among patients with breast cancer, and clinical features at presentation were systematically compared with non-TNBC in an Indian cohort of 20,000 patients. RESULTS: Combined prevalence of TNBC among patients with breast cancer was found to be on the higher side (27%; 95% CI, 24% to 31%). We found that the estrogen receptor (ER) expression cutoff used to determine ER positivity had an influence on the pooled prevalence and ranged from 30% (ER/progesterone receptor [PR] cut ff at 1%) to 24% (ER/PR cutoff at 10%). Odds for TNBC to present in the younger age-group were significantly higher (pooled odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.69), with a significantly younger mean age of incidence (weighted mean difference, −2.75; 95% CI, −3.59 to −1.92). TNBC showed a significantly higher odds of presenting with high grade (pooled OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.12 to 3.12) and lymph node positivity (pooled OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.60) than non-TNBC.CONCLUSION:Systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 studies revealed a high degree of heterogeneity in prevalence of TNBC within Indian patients with breast cancer, yet pooled prevalence of TNBC is high in India. High proportions of patients with TNBC present with aggressive features, such as high grade and lymph node positivity, compared with patients without TNBC. We emphasize the need for standardized methods for accurate diagnosis in countries like India.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJCO Global Oncology, 6, 1052-1062.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2687-8941en_US
dc.identifier.sourcetitleJCO Global Oncologyen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dr.iiserpune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/5803
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1200/go.20.00054
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publication.originofpublisherForeignen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Clinical Oncologyen_US
dc.subjectBiologyen_US
dc.subject2020en_US
dc.titleMeta-Analysis of Prevalence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Its Clinical Features at Incidence in Indian Patients With Breast Canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections